The Corporation of the Town of Essex

Special Council Meeting Minutes

-
Location: https://www.youtube.com/user/EssexOntario
Present:
  • Mayor Larry Snively
  • Deputy Mayor Richard Meloche
  • Councillor Joe Garon
  • Councillor Morley Bowman
  • Councillor Kim Verbeek
  • Councillor Steve Bjorkman
  • Councillor Sherry Bondy
  • Councillor Chris Vander Doelen
Also Present:
  • Chris Nepszy, Director, Infrastructure Services
  • Robert Auger, Clerk, Legal and Legislative Services
  • Shelley Brown, Deputy Clerk, Legal and Legislative Services
  • lmoroz@essex.ca
  • Doug Sweet, Director, Community Services
  • Jeffrey Morrison, Director, Corporate Services and Treasurer
  • Lori Chadwick

The Chair called the meeting to order at 6 pm.

There were no declarations of conflict of interest.

  • SP20-07-011
    Moved ByCouncillor Bjorkman
    Seconded ByCouncillor Bowman

    That the published agenda for the July 13, 2020 Special Council Meeting be adopted with the following amendments:

    - Agenda Item 5 amended to include delegations from:

    - Adam Grant

    - Agenda Item 5 to remove delegations from:

    - Kathy Langlois

    - Richard Herniman

    - Nettie Ridley and Mike Piche

    - Agenda Item 6 amended to include correspondence from:

    - Edward Baldwin

    - Bike Windsor Essex

    - Anne Marie Grant 

    - Bernard Gorski

    Carried

Re: County Road 50 Sign By-Law Review

Lori Chadwick, Director presented an overview of the County 50 Sign By-Law Review outlining the character of County Road 50 and the signage that is currently permitted and not permitted in agricultural districts.

Ms. Chadwick detailed the amendments for consideration including requests to amend the current sign regulation to permit pole signs and electronic media identification and advertising signs.

Ms. Chadwick provided additional details pertaining to the Town’s public consultation efforts including information packages and an online survey through the Town website, social media, local newspapers, email to stakeholders and direct mailing to over 300 property owners that front onto County Road 50.

Ms. Chadwick reviewed the survey results noting that respondents stated that “better permanent signage to eliminate temporary signs and banners” and “better maintenance and refreshing of existing signage” were needed improvements on County Road 50.  Ms. Chadwick further stated that 77% of the respondents stated that they would not be in favour of electronic media signage along County Road 50. 

Ms. Chadwick outlined the next steps normally required as part of the review which includes a Report to Council from administration and final draft by-law amendments, if any required, to be presented at the August 4th Regular council meeting.  She also advised council that there is no appeal period for amendments to this bylaw as it falls under the authority of The Municipal Act.

  • SP20-07-012
    Moved ByCouncillor Bowman
    Seconded ByCouncillor Bjorkman

    That the presentation entitled "County Road 50 Sign By-Law Review" dated July 13, 2020, as prepared by Lori Chadwick, Director, Development Services, be received.

    Carried

Bernard Gorski stated that he supports a by-law change in the area. Mr. Gorski explained that he had his own petition signed on his own to support the change.  Mr. Gorski's petition was to permit a pole sign up to 5 meters in height with a digital component restricted to daylight hours with no nighttime pollution to disturb neighbours.  Mr. Gorski advised that some of the the signatures are from non-residents because the Town's Strategic Plan states that the Town would consider opinions of stakeholders, visitors, tourists and customers. 

Mr. Gorski stated that the wineries are major attraction in area and extra customers that come in to support small businesses in area depend on traffic that wineries help provide into the area and are important for tourism.  Mr. Gorski further stated that the Niagara Region and Prince Edward County allow signage up to 7 meters in height and have a digital media or electronic component.  Mr. Gorski stated that they have a competitive edge with other wineries across Ontario and that this region should have same opportunity.  Local wineries have poured millions of dollars into our area to support the tourism and bring customers, tourists and permanent residents into our area and that they need endorsed new technology to retain them and attract more.  Mr. Gorski stated that he is looking for more professional signage.  Mr. Gorski stated that he is asking council to follow Strategic Plan to promote business growth, bring new people and businesses to our area by allowing the technology available to help them achieve their goals.

Delegate withdrew submission prior to meeting.

5.1.3

Adam Grant stated that changes will profoundly impact the region and not for the betterment of the community.  Mr. Grant added that he lives directly across the street from the sign that was erected and it is very bright and causes hazards to pedestrians and vehicles by being a source of distraction to drivers.  Mr. Grant explained that when the sign was initially operated it illuminated their house and part of County Road 50 and that when covered, it could still be visibly read.  Mr. Grant stated that this issue will resurface wherever this type of sign is installed.  Mr. Grant further added that this area is zoned agricultural and residential not commercial and that the majority of residents that moved there did so to get away from these type of things.

Anne Marie Grant presentation outlined various winery locations including pictures of the types of signage at each location and that no pole signs were erected including areas such as Niagara-on-the-Lake, Okanagan and Tuscany.

Ms. Grant explained how electronic pole signs would have a negative negative for residents including their quality of life and property values as well as the degradation of the historic character of County Road 50.  Ms. Grant added that the premiere wine regions have embraced this natural, organic look. 

Delegate withdrew submission prior to meeting.

Delegate was not present at the electronic meeting.

5.1.8

Joe Lucas stated that he feels that County Road 50 is not broken and does not need to be fixed.  Mr. Lucas stated that By-Law 1350 is good but needs strict application.  Mr. Lucas stated that overall most signs fit within the provisions of By-Law 1350.  Mr. Lucas provided council with some examples of businesses with signage that he felt fit within the historical feel of the road.  Mr. Lucas feels that it all comes down to the suitability of signage in the community as it draws visitors and commerce

Delegate withdrew submission prior to meeting.

  • SP20-07-013
    Moved ByCouncillor Bowman
    Seconded ByCouncillor Vander Doelen

    That the presentations and correspondence (where applicable) listed in Agenda Item 5.1 be received.

    Carried
  • SP20-07-014
    Moved ByCouncillor Bjorkman
    Seconded ByCouncillor Verbeek

    That Council directs administration not to make any changes to current By-Law 1350 but that applicants can apply for a site specific amendment should they choose.

    Carried
  • SP20-07-015
    Moved ByCouncillor Garon
    Seconded ByCouncillor Bjorkman

    That the correspondence listed in Agenda Item 5 be received.

    Carried
  • SP20-07-016
    Moved ByDeputy Mayor Meloche
    Seconded ByCouncillor Verbeek

    That the meeting be adjourned at 7:32.

    Carried