The Corporation of the Town of Essex

Court of Revision Minutes

-
Location: Essex Municipal Building, 33 Talbot Street South
Present:
  • Chair - Dougherty, Janice
  • Member - Dufour, Percy
  • Member - Pocock, Tiffany
Also Present:
  • Lindsay Dean, Drainage Superintendent
  • Tanya Tuzlova, Recording Secretary
  • Joseph Malandruccolo, Director, Legal and Legislative Services/Clerk

Accessible formats or communication supports are available upon request. Please contact the Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or 519-776-7336 extension 1100 or 1101.

Little Drain and Extension, Replacement Bridge for Thompson, 2380 County Road 20 West, Geographic Township of Colchester South,

Report dated February 26th, 2024, Project REI2023D016, Town of Essex, County of Essex

Present from General Public:  Paula Thompson, 2380 County Road 20.


The Chair called meeting to order at 5:00 PM.

We acknowledge that this land is the traditional territory of the Three Fires Confederacy of First Nations (comprised of the Ojibway, the Odawa, and the Potawatomi Peoples), and of the Huron-Wendat Peoples. We value the significant historical and contemporary contributions of local and regional First Nations and all of the Original Peoples of Turtle Island who have been living and working on the land from time immemorial.

There were no declarations of conflict of interest noted at this time.

  • COR 24-07-001
    Moved ByTiffany Pocock
    Seconded ByPercy Dufour

    That the published agenda for the July 3, 2024, Court of Revision be adopted as presented.

    Carried
  • COR 24-07-002
    Moved ByPercy Dufour
    Seconded ByTiffany Pocock

    That the minutes of the Court of Revision held February 21, 2024, be adopted as circulated.

    Carried

Lindsay Dean, Drainage Superintendent, has informed that the scope of this meeting is to hear appeals on assessments. Ms. Dean further explained that components of assessments are benefit, outlet, and special benefit. Ms. Dean noted that possible causes of appeals are that lands are assessed too high or too low, that lands should have been assessed but has not been and due consideration has not been given to the use of lands. 

  • COR 24-07-003
    Moved ByTiffany Pocock
    Seconded ByPercy Dufour

    That the presentation by Lindsay Dean, Drainage Superintendent, be received.

    Carried

Joseph Malandruccolo, Director, Legal and Legislative Services/Clerk, has informed that no written appeals were received by the Clerk’s Office by the due date.

Joseph Malandruccolo, Director, Legal and Legislative Services/Clerk, has informed that no written appeals were received by the Clerk’s Office after the due date.

No correspondence was received regarding this project. 

Mr. Rood provided the detailed overview of the report. Mr. Rood also explained that Thompson bridge is not shown as a legal access in the past drainage reports and therefore all costs related to this bridge will be assessed to the corresponding parcel. Mr. Rood also explained that cost sharing schedule was prepared to assess the future maintenance costs of six bridges on the drain. Mr. Rood added that there were no appeals and has advised to approve the proposed schedules of assessment. 

Ms. Dean noted that Paula Thompson, who was in attendance, will be the only property owner to receive two drain bills. 

  • COR 24-02-004
    Moved ByTiffany Pocock
    Seconded ByPercy Dufour

    That the presentation by Gerard Rood, Professional Engineer, be received.

    Carried

Ms. Thompson has asked why her property is assessed higher than the other properties on the Bridge Cost Sharing schedule. 

Mr. Rood has replied that Ms. Thompson's property is larger than the other residential properties. Mr. Rood also mentioned that most farm properties are assessed much higher than her property.

Ms. Thompson further asked why her property is not cost shared on the first schedule and is cost shared on the second schedule. 

Mr. Rood explained that when the bridge is installed for the first time the cost of works is 100% to the property owner. 

Ms. Dean f asked Mr. Rood to confirm that the first schedule is for the Thompsons' bridge and the second schedule involves the whole drain, to which Mr. Rood answered "Yes, that is correct". Ms. Dean explained that it was her understanding that there were two tasks in the report: to provide for the bridge and to prepare for the future cost sharing for all bridges. Mr. Rood confirmed Ms. Dean's understanding as correct.

Ms. Thompson asked about the estimated life span of her bridge. 

Mr. Rood replied that it is expected that the new corrugated steel pipe culvert bridge will have a useful life of about 75 years. Mr. Rood added that previously the life span of bridges was about 20 years.  

There were no further questions. 

  • COR 24-02-005
    Moved ByPercy Dufour
    Seconded ByTiffany Pocock

    That the assessments contained in the Schedules of Assessment for Little Drain and Extension, Replacement Bridge for Thompson, 2380 County Road 20 West, Geographic Township of Colchester South, Report dated February 26th, 2024, Project REI2023D016, Town of Essex, County of Essex be confirmed as presented.

    Carried
  • COR 24-02-006
    Moved ByTiffany Pocock
    Seconded ByPercy Dufour

    That the meeting be adjourned at 5:14 PM.

    Carried